Ex-Trump aide to tell Congress she objected to Ukrainian ambassadors removal: report | TheHill

A former top aide to President TrumpDonald John TrumpWHCA calls on Trump to denounce video depicting him shooting media outlets Video of fake Trump shooting members of media shown at his Miami resort: report Trump hits Fox News’s Chris Wallace over Ukraine coverage MORE on European and Russian affairs has arrived on Capitol Hill to testify before Congress, where she is expected to detail a “shadow foreign policy” pursued by Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiRand Paul calls for probe of Democrats over Ukraine letter Sunday shows — Officials rush to Trump’s defense on Syria, sanctions Cruz: ‘Of course’ it’s not appropriate to ask China to investigate Bidens MORE and U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland.

Fiona Hill, a former special assistant to the president, on Monday is set to testify that Sondland and Giuliani went around the National Security Council and official White House protocol to speak directly with Trump about Ukraine, NBC reported last week.

Hill’s attorney, Lee Wolosky, confirmed that his client had received a subpoena and intended to answer questioning from members beginning at 10 a.m. She is the first former White House official to agree to cooperate with the House’s impeachment inquiry.

 

Hill will also reportedly testify that she strenuously objected to the removal of former ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, but that her input was disregarded, according to The New York Times.

Hill entered the secured meeting room in the Capitol basement at roughly 9 a.m., an hour before the deposition was scheduled to begin. She declined reporters’ requests for comment.

Republican leaders were more talkative ahead of the hearing.

Reps. Lee ZeldinLee ZeldinGOP lawmaker: Democrats cherry-picking what to leak in impeachment inquiry Sunday Show Preview: Trump’s allies and administration defend decision on Syria He who must not be named: How Hunter Biden became a conversation-stopper MORE (R-N.Y.), Scott PerryScott Gordon PerryEx-Ukraine ambassador arrives to give testimony GOP, Trump look to smother impeachment inquiry The Hill’s Morning Report — DOJ’s planned executions stir new debate MORE (R-Pa.), and Jim JordanJames (Jim) Daniel JordanA Republican Watergate veteran’s perspective on a Trump impeachment In testimony, Dems see an ambassador scorned, while GOP defends Trump Ex-Ukraine ambassador arrives to give testimony MORE (Ohio), senior Republican on the House Oversight and Reform Committee, spoke with reporters on their way into the room, accusing Intelligence Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffTrump hits Fox News’s Chris Wallace over Ukraine coverage Schiff: Whistleblower testimony might not be necessary A Republican Watergate veteran’s perspective on a Trump impeachment MORE (D-Calif.) of conducting an underhanded process by releasing only selected portions of testimony from previous witnesses.

“The tragedy here — the crime here — is that the American people don’t get to see what’s going on in these sessions,” Jordan said of the closed-door session.

The Republicans, in particular, are keen on making public the transcript of the Oct. 3 testimony of Kurt VolkerKurt VolkerGOP lawmaker: Democrats cherry-picking what to leak in impeachment inquiry In testimony, Dems see an ambassador scorned, while GOP defends Trump Cracks emerge in White House strategy as witness testifies MORE, the administration’s former special envoy to Ukraine, who appeared before the committees on Oct. 3.

“He said there was no quid pro quo whatsoever, this process that played out is the typical diplomatic process that plays out when the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people are going to foreign governments,” Jordan said.

Trump and his Republican allies are demanding a vote on the House floor to launch an impeachment inquiry formally — a step that preceded the last two impeachment processes, targeting Presidents Nixon and Clinton. They’re protesting that, as the minority party, they’re denied certain powers, such as the right to call witnesses themselves.

“If the House Democrats want to pursue impeachment, they should put their money where their mouth is and have a vote,” said Zeldin.

Asked which witnesses Republicans would like to hear from, Zeldin did not name names, lamenting that many of the figures cited in documents and testimony are anonymous.

“We just want facts,” he said.

Unlike Volker, Hill will reportedly not present any documents or communications, as she left them behind when she left the White House, according to the Times.

Sondland himself is set to testify Thursday and will reportedly say that a text message in which he said there was “no quid pro quo” conditioning military aid to Ukraine on an investigation of former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump hits Fox News’s Chris Wallace over Ukraine coverage Schiff: Whistleblower testimony might not be necessary Trump warns Democrats will lose House seats over impeachment MORE’s family was dictated by Trump himself and that Sondland was uncertain of its accuracy.

The July 25 call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is at the heart of a whistleblower complaint that prompted the House to announce an impeachment inquiry into Trump last month.

Updated at 10:35 a.m.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *